Sometimes, I like a little variety in the young fiction I
read, and the best way I've found to do this is to look at fiction for a
slightly younger age range. I've done this before on this blog, for example
when I reviewed 'Wonder', and I'm always just a pinch fascinated to see the
differences between what is classified by children’s and YA. However, from
reading ‘Wild Boy’ by Rob Lloyd Jones, I have confirmed my suspicion that it is
not in the enjoyment found by older readers.
'Wild Boy' ticks all the boxes a 10-year-old would like
ticked in a book. Action, adventure, mystery and a heroic underdog to root for.
From about the 1980s to the 2000s, there has been a huge shift in that, in the
more recent films, in the end, everyone who is under appreciated demonstrates
their value and is rewarded zealously for it, be that in popularity, sport or
even singing, if you're Zac Efron. Wild Boy makes a perfect underdog and his
partner in crime Clarissa passes well for a loveable rogue with a tragic past.
Part of what makes this book so appealing is its cast of vivid Victorian-styled
characters. This is not just the circus members, but in the work house and in
the intellectual circles Wild Boy eventually uncovers. These perfectly painted
caricatures cast themselves in roles that are often horrible, and visibly
grotesque (it is a freak show, literally, at points in this novel), and really
bring the story to life. This is helped even further by Rob Lloyd Jones' backdrop
of creepy Victorian London, with twists and turns in setting so frequently, you
may have to be a Londoner (which thankfully I am) to keep up.
This, I would say, was the books only disadvantage. With
such a well-known setting as London, it's impossible to be vague about where
you are placing your tale, but, at the same time, this double edged sword means
you are unable to keep your reader following so vividly at points, without the
aid of a map. This book also suffered a little from too much going on. This
does, as I said, tick every box for a 10-year-old's idea of adventure - but is
that such a good thing? Sometimes less can be more, and, though I'll admit the
pace of the plot kept up, there were so many different settings running around
at a point I was slightly lost. A little more description of each location
would have gone a long way in helping this, but I guess something must be
sacrificed in the name of a fast paced adventure, and setting is not the worst
thing that could have been chosen.
All in all, I was really charmed by 'Wild Boy'. Something
about it felt unique, which is pretty rare in fiction these days. It's been
compared often enough to Sherlock Holmes, but this is selling it short as
simply an emulation of a classic. 'Wild Boy' stands strong as a strong and
fascinating read all on its own, not needing to hold itself as a mimesis, but using well known elements to its best
advantage.